The Washington Post's Endorsement

           

Hello America! First you must all know that the campaign between candidate Sanders and candidate Reid has been going good for the past two weeks. However, The Washington Post has decided not to endorse any candidates, because there has been a lack of clarification on key issues. We as a staff do not see any of these candidates professionally fit for office, because we have seen a lot of shakiness between their views and their leadership.

Over the fast couple months we, as a staff, have observed the highs and lows of both Reid’s campaign and Sanders’ campaign. We admit that there have been many more lows and blows than there have been high fives. In last week’s speech presentation by both candidates, I witnessed a constant use of utterances and hesitation from candidate Sanders. We think articulation and cohesive sentences make a better congress person to represent a district. In addition to that, candidate Reid focused on using reprisal as a humiliation method to attack candidate Sanders. The confidence of candidate Sanders is small and lacking and still I have yet to see any progress and good performance from her. Candidate Reid rather uses his speeches to leave media questions for the most part unanswered. We have concluded that these two candidates are not prepared to lead a district in congress. Frankly, they both seem to be lacking vital information about how the economy works and what powers the institution of the Congress may utilize. For an example, Tina Sanders and her campaign were under the impression that the Federal Reserve controlled the right to create laws that tax big corporations. On the other hand, Rey Reid does not know what Posse Comitatus is and thinks that sending Army troops to the border will help solve the border violence issue. Again, these are only a few examples as to why we feel hesitant about choosing someone to endorse.         

For the most part, and the most important, the candidates have left key controversial questions unanswered. This has been very frustrating to the Washington Post and has frustrated you all as well. It is difficult to derive an answer when a candidate rather deviates from a question that is posed and then goes on to a topic that does not have much relevance to the question.

The Washington Post…